![]() ** because you said that you took a 192k -> 256k, which means to me, So, I'm thinking that you encoded the A.mp3 -> B.ac3, ** QUALITY: B=slight noisy, A=more/less quiet'er You don't know which direction to vote, but. The center (stereo) is not even, and more so towards to Rt chan. Sometimes Rt chan is louder than left most of the time., else I have a bad connection sound card (Turtle Beach) and it has sure signs Happy with it, but I have to say, that my audio is screwy at the moment. Now, I'm not much for audio, and have been known to do 192k and be I gave a little more attention to the challenge and evaluation. My first impression was that *both* sounded good to my ears. Otherwise (around 50% for A and 50% for B) both are the same, hence AC3 256 kbps does not affect mp3 encoded signal.Ībove results could be considered separately for high quality mp3 as well as low quality mp3. ![]() Mp3 is better (or mp3->AC3 is better, which could be theorerically also possible). If listeners would strongly prefer one of the options, we would find out that Results should be published after all votes, so people would not get suggested by previous votes Which of the two sounds in each set (A or B) has better quality, with regard to the reference sounds? Having these two sets (3 sounds in each set: A, B and REF). You would have to do the test in the following way (for example)ġa) Take the original wave (not encoded) -> referenceĢa) Encode it to mp3 (lets say high bitrate -> high quality)ġb) Take the original wave (not encoded) -> referenceĢb) Encode it to mp3 (lets say low bitrate -> with noticable artifacts) I think that more reliably find out what you are looking for,
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |